"What cares the more the blues, the Beatles and the Stones still separated together?" This year I will not talk to my good resolutions because anyway it is useless, they take two hours I have taken within the scope of the mouth so they are even worse than in previous years.
Today I will speak My Challenge to Con 2011. Instead of hoping (vainly) that we will become a better person why not set a target idiot instead? It's much more fun, you see. And then, as laughter is good for you kill two birds with one stone.
So my challenge to the Con for 2011 is to know by heart almost * all of the Beatles discography. Because I love love, huh. This Challenge is not masochistic, in addition to being con. I do not think it will be very useful in society. But it will allow me to argue when you ask me this question that the world fears "Beatles or Stones?" (But I feel that now they ask me the most is always like that). So far, I would argue that the Beatles were four guys in the wind (but of course it is an argument of shit) and I did not like Mike Jagger (which besides being an ADM is a hit and dirty mouth. mea culpa).
Question advancement, I already know by heart almost three albums (actually I cheated, I just started in 2010): A Hard Day's Night , Abbey Road and Beatles for sale . And I'm listening intensive Help!
I invite you to follow my example (when not hurt) and you choose as a Challenge to the Con, which you occupy in the year 2011 and will help you wait in joy and good mood until 2012 hehe you had not seen that one coming, eh!
You can even share your choice in the comments. J'vous not oblige, but I know there's visit (yeah, I spy something for statistics) thus not be shy, people. I'm not a witch. Even if I have warts. Well, not right now. Forgiveness. I digress.
* I have not quite finished deliberating with myself for what I meant by "almost."